Triple
T10508093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Montreal Amendment |
E247835
|
entity |
| Predicate | enteredIntoForceForFirstParties |
P448
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1999 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1999 | Statement: [Montreal Amendment, enteredIntoForceForFirstParties, 1999]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enteredIntoForceForFirstParties Context triple: [Montreal Amendment, enteredIntoForceForFirstParties, 1999]
-
A.
enteredIntoForce
chosen
Indicates that a law, treaty, agreement, or regulation has become legally effective and binding from a specific point in time.
-
B.
enteredIntoForceIn
Indicates that an agreement, law, or treaty became legally effective or operative in a specified place or jurisdiction.
-
C.
enteredIntoForceBy
Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally effective as a result of an action taken by a specified authority, event, or instrument.
-
D.
enteredIntoForceWithInstrument
Indicates that a legal agreement, treaty, or provision became legally binding through or upon the activation of a specific instrument (such as a protocol, act, or implementing document).
-
E.
inForceInPart
Indicates that a rule, agreement, or provision is currently effective only for some of its parts, conditions, or scope, but not in its entirety.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c4aa948190942e1d803143fb0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d509b287ac8190805a2375bd16b7ae |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb919ea08190bcc1193e2014d437 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:26 p.m.