Triple

T10503833
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mabo v Queensland (No 2) E247734 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Mabo v Queensland (No 1) E247734 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mabo v Queensland (No 1) | Statement: [Mabo v Queensland (No 2), relatedTo, Mabo v Queensland (No 1)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mabo v Queensland (No 1)
Context triple: [Mabo v Queensland (No 2), relatedTo, Mabo v Queensland (No 1)]
  • A. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) chosen
    Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
  • B. Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
    The Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is an Australian federal law that recognises and regulates Indigenous Australians’ native title rights to land and waters and establishes the framework for their determination and protection.
  • C. Yolngu land rights movement
    The Yolngu land rights movement is an Indigenous Australian campaign led by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to assert traditional ownership, protect sacred lands, and secure legal recognition of their land and cultural rights.
  • D. Crown in right of Queensland
    The Crown in right of Queensland is the legal embodiment of the Australian monarch as the head of state specifically for the state of Queensland, underpinning its system of government and ownership of public assets.
  • E. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
    Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c4aa948190942e1d803143fb0e completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d5099d62408190a6c6884411c6e423 completed April 7, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d90ddbbb3c8190873e8e3c27039b16 completed April 10, 2026, 2:48 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:26 p.m.