Triple
T10503795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mabo v Queensland (No 2) |
E247734
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mabo and Others v State of Queensland |
E247734
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mabo and Others v State of Queensland | Statement: [Mabo v Queensland (No 2), fullCaseName, Mabo and Others v State of Queensland]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mabo and Others v State of Queensland Context triple: [Mabo v Queensland (No 2), fullCaseName, Mabo and Others v State of Queensland]
-
A.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
chosen
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
-
B.
Yolngu land rights movement
The Yolngu land rights movement is an Indigenous Australian campaign led by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to assert traditional ownership, protect sacred lands, and secure legal recognition of their land and cultural rights.
-
C.
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
The Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is an Australian federal law that recognises and regulates Indigenous Australians’ native title rights to land and waters and establishes the framework for their determination and protection.
-
D.
High Court case Kartinyeri v Commonwealth
Kartinyeri v Commonwealth was a landmark 1998 High Court of Australia case that examined the scope of the federal Parliament’s power to make race-based laws under the Constitution, particularly in the context of Indigenous heritage protection.
-
E.
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c4aa948190942e1d803143fb0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5099d62408190a6c6884411c6e423 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d8dcd89ba481908653730b43e3d4ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:26 p.m.