Triple
T10503686
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gadigal people |
E247732
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageGroup |
P3349
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eora language |
E614033
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eora language | Statement: [Gadigal people, languageGroup, Eora language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eora language Context triple: [Gadigal people, languageGroup, Eora language]
-
A.
Eora language
chosen
The Eora language is an Indigenous Australian language traditionally spoken by the Eora people of the Sydney region, forming a key part of their cultural and historical identity.
-
B.
Teiwa language
Teiwa language is a Papuan language spoken by the Teiwa people on Pantar Island in eastern Indonesia.
-
C.
Moriori language
The Moriori language is an extinct Polynesian language once spoken by the indigenous Moriori people of New Zealand’s Chatham Islands.
-
D.
Taupota language
The Taupota language is an Oceanic language spoken in Papua New Guinea, belonging to the Papuan Tip subgroup of the Austronesian language family.
-
E.
Wiradjuri language
The Wiradjuri language is an Indigenous Australian language traditionally spoken by the Wiradjuri people of central New South Wales and now the focus of active revitalization efforts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c4aa948190942e1d803143fb0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5099d62408190a6c6884411c6e423 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d8dcd89ba481908653730b43e3d4ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:26 p.m.