Triple
T10480198
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mostaqbal Watan Party |
E247149
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingAllianceWith |
P22392
|
FINISHED |
| Object | other pro-Sisi parties in Egypt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other pro-Sisi parties in Egypt | Statement: [Mostaqbal Watan Party, governingAllianceWith, other pro-Sisi parties in Egypt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingAllianceWith Context triple: [Mostaqbal Watan Party, governingAllianceWith, other pro-Sisi parties in Egypt]
-
A.
alliance
Indicates a formal cooperative relationship between entities who agree to support each other in shared goals or interests.
-
B.
soughtAllianceWith
Indicates that one entity actively attempted to form an alliance or cooperative partnership with another entity.
-
C.
governsInCoalition
chosen
Indicates that an entity exercises governing authority jointly with one or more partners as part of a political coalition.
-
D.
allianceType
Indicates the specific kind or category of alliance relationship that exists between entities.
-
E.
allianceDesignation
Indicates a formal relationship in which one entity designates or classifies another as an ally within an alliance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c16c248190a2fe5b471e584e9c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5095b2ec881909e1220d83e750a75 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb8a30848190b33cf43f005a028e |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:22 p.m.