Triple
T10467969
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eurovision Song Contest 1991 |
E246849
|
entity |
| Predicate | winningSongLanguage |
P11404
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Swedish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Swedish | Statement: [Eurovision Song Contest 1991, winningSongLanguage, Swedish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winningSongLanguage Context triple: [Eurovision Song Contest 1991, winningSongLanguage, Swedish]
-
A.
winningSong
Indicates that a song is the one that has won a particular contest, award, or competition.
-
B.
winnerLanguage
Indicates that the associated language is the one used by, or officially recognized for, the winner in a given contest, award, or competitive event.
-
C.
lyricsLanguage
chosen
Indicates the language in which the lyrics of a song or musical work are written or performed.
-
D.
originalLanguageOfWinningWorks
Indicates the language in which the works that won an award or competition were originally created or written.
-
E.
nominatedSong
Indicates that a particular song has been put forward as a candidate for an award, recognition, or similar honor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c16c248190a2fe5b471e584e9c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5092ef810819093a4d1df83aeac09 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb84bafc8190819757b93620508a |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:20 p.m.