Triple
T10449495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moodiesburn |
E246379
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLocalIndustryHistory |
P3008
|
FINISHED |
| Object | coal mining |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coal mining | Statement: [Moodiesburn, hasLocalIndustryHistory, coal mining]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalIndustryHistory Context triple: [Moodiesburn, hasLocalIndustryHistory, coal mining]
-
A.
hasIndustrialHeritage
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with historically significant industrial sites, structures, or practices.
-
B.
hasHistoricIndustry
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been associated with a notable or historically significant industry or industrial activity in the past.
-
C.
hasSmallTownIndustry
Indicates that a small town possesses or supports a particular type of industry or industrial activity.
-
D.
hasLocalGovernmentHistory
Indicates that an entity has a documented history or record of its local governmental structure, activities, or developments.
-
E.
hasIndustrialTown
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a town characterized primarily by industrial activities or facilities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c04fe08190957c26c526a3b05a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4fe09af04819083db42f4de4cb0a9 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb73a5e48190a8df4775bc5da80f |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:17 p.m.