Triple
T10445208
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hercule Poirot |
E246267
|
entity |
| Predicate | methodOfInvestigation |
P22717
|
FINISHED |
| Object | deductive reasoning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: deductive reasoning | Statement: [Hercule Poirot, methodOfInvestigation, deductive reasoning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: methodOfInvestigation Context triple: [Hercule Poirot, methodOfInvestigation, deductive reasoning]
-
A.
typeOfInvestigation
Indicates the specific kind or category of investigation being conducted or referred to in the relationship.
-
B.
usesInvestigativeMethods
chosen
Indicates that an entity employs investigative techniques or procedures to gather information, analyze evidence, or uncover facts.
-
C.
settingOfInvestigation
Indicates the context, environment, or circumstances in which an investigation takes place.
-
D.
resultOfInvestigation
Indicates that something (such as a finding, conclusion, or outcome) is produced or determined as the consequence of an investigation.
-
E.
diagnosisMethod
Indicates the method, procedure, or technique used to establish or confirm a diagnosis for a condition or case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c04fe08190957c26c526a3b05a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4fe083cd881909d2d8ad75d1d94cb |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb73a5e48190a8df4775bc5da80f |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:16 p.m.