Triple

T1044364
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arendal E22542 entity
Predicate locatedIn P40 FINISHED
Object Agder E120897 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Agder | Statement: [Arendal, locatedIn, Agder]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Agder
Context triple: [Arendal, locatedIn, Agder]
  • A. Agder chosen
    Agder is a county in southern Norway known for its long coastline, maritime heritage, and popular coastal towns and islands.
  • B. Aust-Agder
    Aust-Agder was a former county in southern Norway known for its coastal towns, forests, and role in the country’s maritime and timber industries.
  • C. Buskerud
    Buskerud is a former county in southeastern Norway known for its varied landscape of forests, rivers, and mountains, including parts of the Hallingdal valley and Hardangervidda plateau.
  • D. Vestfold og Telemark
    Vestfold og Telemark is a former county in southeastern Norway known for its coastal towns, industrial heritage, and varied landscapes from fjords to inland forests and mountains.
  • E. Hedmark
    Hedmark is a former county in eastern Norway known for its vast forests, agriculture, and inland landscapes along the Swedish border.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493d91478819094cc01fb65564bc1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b84937688190a5899af2104002df completed March 1, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ac4c18692c819092e1045199053a39 completed March 7, 2026, 4:02 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.