Triple
T1043666
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Johan Håstad |
E22525
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
“Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits”
“Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” is a seminal theoretical computer science paper by Johan Håstad that establishes near-tight lower bounds on the size of constant-depth Boolean circuits, profoundly influencing circuit complexity theory.
|
E120580
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” | Statement: [Johan Håstad, notableWork, “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits”]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” Context triple: [Johan Håstad, notableWork, “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits”]
-
A.
Blum complexity measures
Blum complexity measures are a formal framework in computational complexity theory that rigorously define and compare the resource usage (such as time or space) of algorithms via axiomatic conditions.
-
B.
Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques
"Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced powerful interactive proof techniques to show that finding near-maximum cliques in graphs is computationally intractable to approximate within strong bounds.
-
C.
The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems
"The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced the notion of zero-knowledge proofs, fundamentally shaping modern cryptography and complexity theory.
-
D.
PCP theorem
The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
-
E.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing is a 1985 ACM conference volume collecting influential research papers in theoretical computer science, including foundational work on topics such as interactive proof systems and computational complexity.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” Triple: [Johan Håstad, notableWork, “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits”]
Generated description
“Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” is a seminal theoretical computer science paper by Johan Håstad that establishes near-tight lower bounds on the size of constant-depth Boolean circuits, profoundly influencing circuit complexity theory.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” Target entity description: “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” is a seminal theoretical computer science paper by Johan Håstad that establishes near-tight lower bounds on the size of constant-depth Boolean circuits, profoundly influencing circuit complexity theory.
-
A.
Blum complexity measures
Blum complexity measures are a formal framework in computational complexity theory that rigorously define and compare the resource usage (such as time or space) of algorithms via axiomatic conditions.
-
B.
Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques
"Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced powerful interactive proof techniques to show that finding near-maximum cliques in graphs is computationally intractable to approximate within strong bounds.
-
C.
The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems
"The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced the notion of zero-knowledge proofs, fundamentally shaping modern cryptography and complexity theory.
-
D.
PCP theorem
The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
-
E.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing is a 1985 ACM conference volume collecting influential research papers in theoretical computer science, including foundational work on topics such as interactive proof systems and computational complexity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493d91478819094cc01fb65564bc1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b8475ab48190848388eea6448cb6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ac3bc97dec81909b6ad48e3f203923 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 2:52 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ac3c42c2c081909ccadbf944d3aa6c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 2:54 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ac3cbd43848190854add440753fdad |
completed | March 7, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.