Triple
T10434698
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Government of Lithuania |
E246007
|
entity |
| Predicate | re-establishedIn |
P9113
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1990 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1990 | Statement: [Government of Lithuania, re-establishedIn, 1990]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: re-establishedIn Context triple: [Government of Lithuania, re-establishedIn, 1990]
-
A.
re-establishedAfter
Indicates that a relationship or state was previously ended or inactive and then brought back into effect following a specified event or time.
-
B.
reincorporated
Indicates that an entity has been formed again or brought back into existence as a corporation after having previously ceased or changed its corporate status.
-
C.
reconstructedIn
Indicates that something has been rebuilt, restored, or re-created within a particular context, location, or medium.
-
D.
reestablishedInYear
chosen
Indicates that an entity, previously existing and then discontinued or dissolved, was brought back into existence or operation in the specified year.
-
E.
reintroduced
Indicates that an entity that was previously removed, extinct, or absent has been brought back or restored to a place, context, or state.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381bf3dc08190bf35a2643e4e8f22 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4ea67344c81909984ab99b0ef1e64 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfbc546881908f312c66ee195f79 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:14 p.m.