Triple

T10431585
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hold Up E245925 entity
Predicate containsInterpolationOf P82103 FINISHED
Object Maps LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maps | Statement: [Hold Up, containsInterpolationOf, Maps]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsInterpolationOf
Context triple: [Hold Up, containsInterpolationOf, Maps]
  • A. usesInterpolationFrom
    Indicates that one entity derives or computes its values by applying interpolation based on data or parameters obtained from another entity.
  • B. hasNotableInterpolationIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity contains a significant or noteworthy interpolation, insertion, or embedded segment within the other entity.
  • C. hasInterpolation
    Indicates that one value, state, or representation is derived from others by applying an interpolation method between them.
  • D. hasIntercalation
    Indicates that an entity includes or undergoes the insertion of additional elements (such as units, segments, or periods) into an existing ordered sequence or structure.
  • E. interpolationOf
    Indicates that one entity is derived by estimating intermediate values between known data points of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381bf3dc08190bf35a2643e4e8f22 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4ea63f03c81908331655241102725 completed April 7, 2026, 11:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfbc546881908f312c66ee195f79 completed April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:13 p.m.