Triple
T10425161
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House Journal |
E245765
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeRequiredBy |
P31918
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional provisions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional provisions | Statement: [House Journal, mayBeRequiredBy, constitutional provisions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeRequiredBy Context triple: [House Journal, mayBeRequiredBy, constitutional provisions]
-
A.
mayBeRequestedIn
Indicates that one entity is allowed or eligible to be requested within the context or scope of another entity.
-
B.
requiredBy
Indicates that one entity depends on or cannot function properly without another entity being present, completed, or satisfied.
-
C.
mayRequireComponent
chosen
Indicates that one entity can optionally depend on or need another entity as a component for its proper use or operation.
-
D.
requiredTo
Indicates that one entity has an obligation or necessity to perform an action or satisfy a condition in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
mayBeFilledBy
Indicates that one entity has the potential or permission to be occupied, completed, or satisfied by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381bf3dc08190bf35a2643e4e8f22 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4ea48cb348190ad4432f263300592 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfb9d3648190aaabed901f22a8c0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:12 p.m.