Triple
T10415279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Helpless |
E245497
|
entity |
| Predicate | musicStyleInfluence |
P20936
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contemporary R&B |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contemporary R&B | Statement: [Helpless, musicStyleInfluence, contemporary R&B]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicStyleInfluence Context triple: [Helpless, musicStyleInfluence, contemporary R&B]
-
A.
hasGenreInfluenceOn
Indicates that one genre has a notable impact on shaping or influencing the characteristics, style, or development of another genre.
-
B.
styleOfMusic
Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
-
C.
influencedByGenre
chosen
Indicates that something’s characteristics, style, or development are shaped or affected by a particular genre.
-
D.
hasMusicalStyleSimilarTo
Indicates that two entities share a comparable or closely related musical style or sound.
-
E.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381be340c8190b05998703d42d224 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4ea0f7d188190a60a7c3832c51515 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfb6f160819090040644a12395ec |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:10 p.m.