Triple

T10411979
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DC SFRA E245412 entity
Predicate hasViolationConsequence P36372 FINISHED
Object possible interception by military aircraft LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possible interception by military aircraft | Statement: [DC SFRA, hasViolationConsequence, possible interception by military aircraft]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasViolationConsequence
Context triple: [DC SFRA, hasViolationConsequence, possible interception by military aircraft]
  • A. hasConsequence
    Indicates that one event, action, or condition leads to or results in another as its outcome or effect.
  • B. violationConsequences chosen
    Indicates the negative outcomes, penalties, or repercussions that result from a violation of a rule, law, or agreement.
  • C. hasConsequenceHypothesis
    Indicates that one situation, event, or statement is hypothesized to lead to or imply a particular consequence.
  • D. violationOf
    Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
  • E. hasJurisdictionalConsequence
    Indicates that an action, decision, or fact results in a legal or administrative effect within a particular jurisdiction or authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381be340c8190b05998703d42d224 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e9fc72d081908d81c71133973daf completed April 7, 2026, 11:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfb6f160819090040644a12395ec completed April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:10 p.m.