Triple

T10398532
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Legislative Council of Quebec E245082 entity
Predicate hadLegislativePower P2844 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Legislative Council of Quebec, hadLegislativePower, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadLegislativePower
Context triple: [Legislative Council of Quebec, hadLegislativePower, yes]
  • A. hasLegislativePower chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
  • B. hasLegislatureType
    Indicates the specific form or system of legislature that an entity possesses or operates under.
  • C. hasAssociatedLegislature
    Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific legislative body that holds authority or responsibility over it.
  • D. legislativeRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or performs a specific official position, function, or duty within a legislative body or lawmaking process.
  • E. hasLegislativeType
    Indicates that something is associated with, classified by, or characterized as a particular type or category of legislation or legislative measure.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e9d1f2408190beaa8197641c66b4 completed April 7, 2026, 11:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfb438c481908dff87c47de2f069 completed April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:07 p.m.