Triple
T10389258
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Weil pairing |
E244846
|
entity |
| Predicate | valuesIn |
P93941
|
FINISHED |
| Object | group of n-th roots of unity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: group of n-th roots of unity | Statement: [Weil pairing, valuesIn, group of n-th roots of unity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: valuesIn Context triple: [Weil pairing, valuesIn, group of n-th roots of unity]
-
A.
value
Indicates that one entity possesses, represents, or corresponds to a particular quantity, quality, or assigned worth.
-
B.
valuedBy
Indicates that one entity is regarded as important, useful, or held in high esteem by another entity.
-
C.
isValuedFor
Indicates that one entity is appreciated, esteemed, or considered important because of a particular quality, contribution, or characteristic it provides to another entity.
-
D.
valueExpressed
Indicates that a particular value, opinion, or quantitative measure is articulated, represented, or made explicit by an entity or expression.
-
E.
valueExample
Indicates that something is provided as an illustrative or sample instance of a particular value.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e9b40dd8819080ac839487020a44 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfb0e7a88190bec0b7a52c70dfe2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.