Triple

T10389180
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Weil divisor E244844 entity
Predicate hasEquivalenceRelation P93932 FINISHED
Object linear equivalence of divisors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linear equivalence of divisors | Statement: [Weil divisor, hasEquivalenceRelation, linear equivalence of divisors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEquivalenceRelation
Context triple: [Weil divisor, hasEquivalenceRelation, linear equivalence of divisors]
  • A. hasEquivalent
    Indicates that two entities are considered equal in value, meaning, or function within a given context.
  • B. hasStateEquivalent
    Indicates that two entities share an equivalent state or condition, even if they are not otherwise identical.
  • C. isEquiconsistentWith
    Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
  • D. requiresEquatableElements
    Indicates that the relationship or operation can only be applied when the involved elements support equality comparison with one another.
  • E. equivalentTo
    Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e9b40dd8819080ac839487020a44 completed April 7, 2026, 11:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfb0e7a88190bec0b7a52c70dfe2 completed April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.