Triple
T10386172
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York |
E244767
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithEra |
P561
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence
The Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence was a period in early 20th-century U.S. constitutional law during which the Court frequently struck down economic regulations by invoking a broad interpretation of freedom of contract under the Due Process Clause.
|
E54705
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence | Statement: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, associatedWithEra, Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence Context triple: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, associatedWithEra, Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence]
-
A.
Lochner v. New York
Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
-
B.
New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence
New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence refers to the body of decisions in the 1930s and early 1940s that redefined federal power, economic regulation, and constitutional interpretation in response to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation.
-
C.
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the federal government’s power to regulate monopolies under the Commerce Clause, weakening early enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
-
D.
Warren Court era
The Warren Court era was the period of the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953–1969), noted for its landmark decisions expanding civil rights, civil liberties, and judicial protections for individuals.
-
E.
dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York
The dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York is Justice John Marshall Harlan’s influential critique of the Supreme Court’s use of substantive due process to strike down labor regulations, emphasizing judicial restraint and deference to state police powers.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence Triple: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, associatedWithEra, Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence]
Generated description
The Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence was a period in early 20th-century U.S. constitutional law during which the Court frequently struck down economic regulations by invoking a broad interpretation of freedom of contract under the Due Process Clause.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence Target entity description: The Lochner era of Supreme Court jurisprudence was a period in early 20th-century U.S. constitutional law during which the Court frequently struck down economic regulations by invoking a broad interpretation of freedom of contract under the Due Process Clause.
-
A.
Lochner v. New York
chosen
Lochner v. New York is a landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state labor regulation and became emblematic of the era in which the Court used substantive due process to protect economic liberty and limit government regulation of business.
-
B.
New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence
New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence refers to the body of decisions in the 1930s and early 1940s that redefined federal power, economic regulation, and constitutional interpretation in response to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation.
-
C.
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the federal government’s power to regulate monopolies under the Commerce Clause, weakening early enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
-
D.
Warren Court era
The Warren Court era was the period of the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953–1969), noted for its landmark decisions expanding civil rights, civil liberties, and judicial protections for individuals.
-
E.
dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York
The dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York is Justice John Marshall Harlan’s influential critique of the Supreme Court’s use of substantive due process to strike down labor regulations, emphasizing judicial restraint and deference to state police powers.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e9a42e748190b10fa7b4ca006bad |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:25 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d795a30a008190a42db2eda3b5dca2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d797a355488190ad088ea0253a98d7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d7982bf5b0819085886d96ea87fa50 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.