Triple
T10386157
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York |
E244767
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnFreedomOfContract |
P24624
|
FINISHED |
| Object | freedom of contract is not absolute and may be reasonably regulated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: freedom of contract is not absolute and may be reasonably regulated | Statement: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, viewOnFreedomOfContract, freedom of contract is not absolute and may be reasonably regulated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnFreedomOfContract Context triple: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, viewOnFreedomOfContract, freedom of contract is not absolute and may be reasonably regulated]
-
A.
contractFeature
Indicates that one entity is a feature, term, or provision that is included in or associated with a particular contract.
-
B.
typeOfContract
Indicates the specific kind or category of contractual agreement that applies between the related entities.
-
C.
legalContent
Indicates that the associated material complies with applicable laws and regulations and is permitted for use, distribution, or display.
-
D.
contractValue
Indicates the monetary worth or agreed-upon financial amount specified in a contract between parties.
-
E.
legalDetail
chosen
Indicates that there is specific legal information, conditions, or attributes associated with the related entity or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e9a42e748190b10fa7b4ca006bad |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfb0e7a88190bec0b7a52c70dfe2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.