Triple
T10386144
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York |
E244767
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionOnOutcome |
P93912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | would have upheld the New York labor law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: would have upheld the New York labor law | Statement: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, positionOnOutcome, would have upheld the New York labor law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnOutcome Context triple: [dissenting opinion in Lochner v. New York, positionOnOutcome, would have upheld the New York labor law]
-
A.
positionOn
Indicates that one entity is located on top of or at a specific place along the surface or extent of another entity.
-
B.
positionOnReason
Indicates that one entity holds a particular stance, justification, or rationale concerning another entity or issue.
-
C.
positionOnGood
Indicates the stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a particular good, such as support, opposition, or neutrality.
-
D.
positionInCase
Indicates the specific role, status, or placement that an entity holds within a particular case or legal proceeding.
-
E.
positionSucceeded
Indicates that one position directly follows and replaces another in a sequence or role.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e9a42e748190b10fa7b4ca006bad |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dfb0e7a88190bec0b7a52c70dfe2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.