Triple
T10369420
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upshur County, Texas |
E244337
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsSettlement |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gilmer, Texas |
E548862
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gilmer, Texas | Statement: [Upshur County, Texas, containsSettlement, Gilmer, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gilmer, Texas Context triple: [Upshur County, Texas, containsSettlement, Gilmer, Texas]
-
A.
Gilmer, Texas
chosen
Gilmer, Texas is a small East Texas city in Upshur County known for its rural character and annual East Texas Yamboree festival.
-
B.
Wilmer, Texas
Wilmer, Texas is a small city in Dallas County that forms part of the southern Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
-
C.
Millican, Texas
Millican, Texas is a small rural community in east-central Texas known for its historic role as an early railroad town.
-
D.
Gainesville, Texas
Gainesville, Texas is a small North Texas city near the Oklahoma border known as the county seat of Cooke County and a regional hub within the Texoma area.
-
E.
Mission, Texas
Mission, Texas is a city in the Rio Grande Valley in southern Texas, known for its agricultural industry and proximity to the U.S.–Mexico border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b3e328819094b23b8edcd29b5a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e9725fa08190816bedf0acefbc2a |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d96b1d5b388190841ed0df2145ad7a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:01 p.m.