Triple
T10365738
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lydia Bennet |
E244245
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToKittyBennet |
P93594
|
FINISHED |
| Object | closest companion among the sisters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: closest companion among the sisters | Statement: [Lydia Bennet, relationshipToKittyBennet, closest companion among the sisters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToKittyBennet Context triple: [Lydia Bennet, relationshipToKittyBennet, closest companion among the sisters]
-
A.
relationshipToCatherine
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to the person named Catherine.
-
B.
relationshipWithKat Barton
Indicates the existence or nature of a relationship that an entity has with Kat Barton.
-
C.
relationshipToHenry
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Henry.
-
D.
relationshipToBenjy
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Benjy.
-
E.
relationshipToHannah
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Hannah.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b3e328819094b23b8edcd29b5a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e96f25f48190a41c8b0206b9238c |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4dface5508190a7b42f01ad0a19a2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4e944fac4819093b0312aa0efd729 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, noon