Triple

T10352674
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scotland (as doctrinal standard in part) E243917 entity
Predicate hasConfessionalFamily P93822 FINISHED
Object Reformed LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reformed | Statement: [Scotland (as doctrinal standard in part), hasConfessionalFamily, Reformed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConfessionalFamily
Context triple: [Scotland (as doctrinal standard in part), hasConfessionalFamily, Reformed]
  • A. confessionalFamily
    Indicates a relationship where one party reveals personal, often sensitive or secret information to another in a trusted, confessional context.
  • B. hasConfessionals
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with one or more confessional segments or statements.
  • C. hasConfessionalDocument
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is documented by a formal confessional document (such as a statement of faith, creed, or confession).
  • D. usesConfessions
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on another entity’s confessions as a basis for some action, decision, or outcome.
  • E. usesConfession
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a confession (typically an admission of guilt or wrongdoing) as part of its actions or reasoning toward another entity or outcome.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381b22b8c8190aaed476be5f872a9 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e949b8e88190ad933399323aed73 completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfa657f481909cc5cc8fec00ad19 completed April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:57 a.m.