Triple

T10341328
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 E243132 entity
Predicate reformKnownAs P89074 FINISHED
Object modernisation of EU antitrust rules LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modernisation of EU antitrust rules | Statement: [Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, reformKnownAs, modernisation of EU antitrust rules]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reformKnownAs
Context triple: [Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, reformKnownAs, modernisation of EU antitrust rules]
  • A. reformName
    Indicates that an entity has undergone a reform or change resulting in a new name or designation.
  • B. knownAsBy
    Indicates that one entity is referred to or recognized by another entity using a particular name or designation.
  • C. changedNameInHonorOf
    Indicates that an entity altered its name specifically to honor or pay tribute to another entity.
  • D. officialRenaming
    Indicates that an entity has been given a new official name, formally replacing its previous designation.
  • E. afterConversionKnownAs chosen
    Indicates that an entity is referred to by a new name or identifier after undergoing a conversion or transformation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e91fdb2081909866c6ecf417d75a completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4df9dc3208190bf1bd106f44f6202 completed April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:55 a.m.