Triple
T10334288
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pinckney Plan |
E242958
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedStateRelations |
P56226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stronger national government over the states |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stronger national government over the states | Statement: [Pinckney Plan, proposedStateRelations, stronger national government over the states]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedStateRelations Context triple: [Pinckney Plan, proposedStateRelations, stronger national government over the states]
-
A.
proposedRelationship
chosen
Indicates that one entity has suggested or put forward the possibility of entering into a specific type of relationship with another entity.
-
B.
proposition3States
Indicates that a third proposition articulates, asserts, or formally states a particular claim, condition, or content.
-
C.
subjectRelation
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relational role or connection to another entity.
-
D.
stepRelation
Indicates a relationship where one entity is a step-relative of another, such as a stepparent, stepchild, or stepsibling connection.
-
E.
associatedState
Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular state, condition, or status of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e91fdb2081909866c6ecf417d75a |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4df9dc3208190bf1bd106f44f6202 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:53 a.m.