Triple
T10334276
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pinckney Plan |
E242958
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedSupremacy |
P2949
|
FINISHED |
| Object | national laws supreme over state laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: national laws supreme over state laws | Statement: [Pinckney Plan, proposedSupremacy, national laws supreme over state laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedSupremacy Context triple: [Pinckney Plan, proposedSupremacy, national laws supreme over state laws]
-
A.
rejectsSupremacy
Indicates that one entity actively opposes, denies, or refuses to accept the dominance or superiority claims of another entity or group.
-
B.
supremacyClause
chosen
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
-
C.
deFactoSupremacyOver
Indicates a relationship in which one entity effectively holds dominant control or authority over another in practice, regardless of formal or legal status.
-
D.
proposedJudiciary
Indicates that an entity has formally suggested or put forward another entity to serve in a judicial role or as part of a judicial body.
-
E.
proposedLaw
Indicates that an entity has formally put forward a law or legislative measure for consideration or approval.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e91fdb2081909866c6ecf417d75a |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4df9dc3208190bf1bd106f44f6202 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:53 a.m.