Triple

T10334267
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pinckney Plan E242958 entity
Predicate proposedVetoPower P72417 FINISHED
Object executive and judiciary joint veto LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: executive and judiciary joint veto | Statement: [Pinckney Plan, proposedVetoPower, executive and judiciary joint veto]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedVetoPower
Context triple: [Pinckney Plan, proposedVetoPower, executive and judiciary joint veto]
  • A. vetoedBy
    Indicates that an action, decision, or proposal was rejected or blocked by a specific entity with veto authority.
  • B. hasVetoPower chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses the authority to unilaterally reject or block decisions, actions, or proposals made by another entity or group.
  • C. vetoType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of veto applied in a decision-making or approval process.
  • D. vetoOverrideBy
    Indicates that a decision or law previously vetoed by one authority is subsequently overridden and enacted by another authority with sufficient power.
  • E. voteFor
    Indicates that one entity casts or expresses a vote in favor of another entity or option.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e91fdb2081909866c6ecf417d75a completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4df9dc3208190bf1bd106f44f6202 completed April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:53 a.m.