Triple

T10330102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject WMS E242851 entity
Predicate supportsMultipleStylesPerLayer P93452 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [WMS, supportsMultipleStylesPerLayer, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMultipleStylesPerLayer
Context triple: [WMS, supportsMultipleStylesPerLayer, true]
  • A. supportsLayerHierarchy
    Indicates that one element can contain and organize other elements within a structured, ordered layer system.
  • B. supportsMarkupStyle
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, rendering, or otherwise working with a specified markup style associated with another entity.
  • C. supportsLayeredDivisionMultiplexing
    Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with the use of layered division multiplexing techniques in conjunction with another entity.
  • D. supportsMultipleRanges
    Indicates that an entity can handle, accept, or operate over more than one distinct range of values or intervals.
  • E. mayHoldStyle
    Indicates that an entity is permitted or able to possess or be associated with a particular style or stylistic attribute.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d7fb77348190ac8ff887f6f03450 completed April 7, 2026, 10:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1f760e88190abea6dcc4f04f2c1 completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4d7cada7881908beba55a1dc9ecb9 completed April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:52 a.m.