Triple
T10328886
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ByteLengthQueuingStrategy |
E242828
|
entity |
| Predicate | constructorParameterType |
P93436
|
FINISHED |
| Object | number |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: number | Statement: [ByteLengthQueuingStrategy, constructorParameterType, number]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constructorParameterType Context triple: [ByteLengthQueuingStrategy, constructorParameterType, number]
-
A.
argumentType
Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
-
B.
componentType
Indicates that one entity specifies or classifies the kind or category of component that another entity represents or uses.
-
C.
operatorClass
Indicates the classification or category of an operator in terms of its type, role, or functional group within a system or domain.
-
D.
compilerType
Indicates the specific kind or category of compiler associated with or used by an entity.
-
E.
inferredType
Indicates that an entity has a type or category that has been deduced or derived rather than explicitly stated.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d7cfd54c8190b6f88598339536d1 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1f64a648190a79980d647898eb0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4d7cada7881908beba55a1dc9ecb9 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:52 a.m.