Triple
T10324036
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ricky "Jupe" Park |
E242712
|
entity |
| Predicate | endangers |
P16824
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jupiter's Claim audience |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jupiter's Claim audience | Statement: [Ricky "Jupe" Park, endangers, Jupiter's Claim audience]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endangers Context triple: [Ricky "Jupe" Park, endangers, Jupiter's Claim audience]
-
A.
endangerment
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which one entity exposes another to potential harm, risk, or danger.
-
B.
threatenedBy
Indicates that one entity poses a danger or potential harm to another entity.
-
C.
dangerousWhen
Indicates that one entity becomes harmful, risky, or unsafe under the conditions or in the presence of another entity or situation.
-
D.
dangerWarning
Indicates that one entity issues or represents a warning about potential danger associated with another entity or situation.
-
E.
inDangerSince
Indicates that an entity has been in a state of danger continuously starting from a specified point in time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d7ccb7ec8190a538cf279e48116e |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1f64a648190a79980d647898eb0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:51 a.m.