Triple

T10317388
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elbert County (eastern parts) E242051 entity
Predicate hasHousingPattern P40076 FINISHED
Object dispersed rural residences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dispersed rural residences | Statement: [Elbert County (eastern parts), hasHousingPattern, dispersed rural residences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHousingPattern
Context triple: [Elbert County (eastern parts), hasHousingPattern, dispersed rural residences]
  • A. housingPattern chosen
    Indicates the typical arrangement or distribution of housing units or residential structures within a given area or context.
  • B. hasHousingUnits
    Indicates that an entity possesses or contains a specified number or set of housing units.
  • C. hasHouseWithin
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a house that is located within the spatial or administrative boundaries of another entity.
  • D. hasHouse
    Indicates that one entity possesses, owns, or is provided with a house in relation to another entity.
  • E. hasBuildingPattern
    Indicates that an entity exhibits or follows a particular architectural or structural building pattern.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381ac38808190a8ca7457c85b625b completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d7ccb7ec8190a538cf279e48116e completed April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1f4f354819080b4ed4bc61bdff6 completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:49 a.m.