Triple

T10316397
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dukedom of Grafton E242025 entity
Predicate linkedToRoyalIllegitimateLine P81631 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Dukedom of Grafton, linkedToRoyalIllegitimateLine, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedToRoyalIllegitimateLine
Context triple: [Dukedom of Grafton, linkedToRoyalIllegitimateLine, true]
  • A. hasRoyalConnection
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or associated in some notable way to royalty, a royal family, or a royal institution.
  • B. hasRoyalAncestryFrom
    Indicates that one entity possesses royal lineage or descent originating from another entity.
  • C. relatedRoyalHouse
    Indicates a relationship where one royal house is historically, genealogically, or politically connected to another royal house.
  • D. generationWithinImperialFamily
    Indicates the ordinal generation level of an individual within an imperial family lineage (e.g., first generation, second generation).
  • E. royalAssociation chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected or linked to royalty, a royal person, or a royal institution.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381ac38808190a8ca7457c85b625b completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d7ccb7ec8190a538cf279e48116e completed April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1f4f354819080b4ed4bc61bdff6 completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:49 a.m.