Triple

T10316195
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject STORM Working Group E242020 entity
Predicate produces P490 FINISHED
Object RFCs E5627 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFCs | Statement: [STORM Working Group, produces, RFCs]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFCs
Context triple: [STORM Working Group, produces, RFCs]
  • A. RFCs chosen
    RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
  • B. RFC
    RFC is the commonly used abbreviation for Reading Football Club, a professional English football team based in Reading, Berkshire.
  • C. RFC
    RFC is the common abbreviation for the Richmond Football Club, a professional Australian rules football team based in Melbourne that competes in the Australian Football League (AFL).
  • D. RFC
    RFC is the common abbreviation for Rangers Football Club, a professional football team based in Glasgow, Scotland.
  • E. RFC 1664
    RFC 1664 is an early Internet standards document that defined a now-obsolete mechanism related to email or messaging services, later superseded by RFC 1901.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381ac38808190a8ca7457c85b625b completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d35c39148190ab2622a2204aca3b completed April 7, 2026, 9:50 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d71d86c7e481908a0d5e65f66ab2c0 completed April 9, 2026, 3:31 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:49 a.m.