Triple
T10303118
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rose Pastor Stokes |
E241682
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stokes |
E155866
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stokes | Statement: [Rose Pastor Stokes, familyName, Stokes]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stokes Context triple: [Rose Pastor Stokes, familyName, Stokes]
-
A.
Stokes
chosen
Stokes is a surname most famously associated with George Gabriel Stokes, a 19th-century Irish mathematician and physicist known for his foundational work in fluid dynamics and optics.
-
B.
Saffman
Saffman is a surname most notably associated with Philip G. Saffman, a prominent British-American applied mathematician and fluid dynamicist.
-
C.
Blasius
Blasius is a Latinized form of the given name Blaise, historically associated with Christian saints and scholars.
-
D.
Styer
Styer is a party to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Yamashita v. Styer, which addressed the legal responsibility of military commanders for war crimes committed by their subordinates.
-
E.
Reynolds
Reynolds is a common English surname borne by numerous notable figures in entertainment, politics, sports, and other fields.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381ac38808190a8ca7457c85b625b |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d30846108190875042ab1c0204e0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d71d4f6c30819098bcdc77ba1836c3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:45 a.m.