Triple
T10302319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carl E. Wieman |
E241662
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wieman |
E239476
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wieman | Statement: [Carl E. Wieman, familyName, Wieman]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wieman Context triple: [Carl E. Wieman, familyName, Wieman]
-
A.
Wieman
chosen
Wieman is the surname of Carl E. Wieman, a Nobel Prize–winning American physicist known for his work on Bose–Einstein condensates.
-
B.
Westheimer
Westheimer is a surname most notably associated with American chemist Frank H. Westheimer, a pioneering figure in physical organic chemistry.
-
C.
Waldman
Waldman is a surname most notably associated with Eyal Waldman, an Israeli entrepreneur and co-founder of the high-performance networking company Mellanox Technologies.
-
D.
Wyman
Wyman is a character appearing in Willard Van Orman Quine’s philosophical essay “On What There Is,” used to illustrate issues in ontology and the problem of non-existent objects.
-
E.
Weissmann
Weissmann is a surname most notably associated with Franz Weissmann, a prominent Brazilian sculptor of Austrian origin known for his geometric abstract works.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381aaafc08190af475ef58dc16aba |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d30716d8819085e25a78e6af3b9d |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d71d4f6c30819098bcdc77ba1836c3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:45 a.m.