Triple

T10272901
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Southern Case for School Segregation E240883 entity
Predicate positionAdvocated P33 FINISHED
Object support for racial segregation in public schools LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: support for racial segregation in public schools | Statement: [The Southern Case for School Segregation, positionAdvocated, support for racial segregation in public schools]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionAdvocated
Context triple: [The Southern Case for School Segregation, positionAdvocated, support for racial segregation in public schools]
  • A. positionOnRights
    Indicates a stance, opinion, or policy an entity holds regarding rights (such as legal, human, or civil rights).
  • B. advocates chosen
    Indicates that one entity publicly supports, recommends, or argues in favor of another entity or its interests.
  • C. positionOpposed
    Indicates that two entities hold positions or stances that are in direct conflict or opposition to each other.
  • D. advocatesAgainst
    Indicates that one entity actively opposes, argues against, or campaigns to prevent or stop another entity, action, or idea.
  • E. positionOnReason
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular stance, justification, or rationale concerning another entity or issue.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381a94c1881908fc38fc263d9b9c2 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d288acf48190bbf14a5cb2dfe1f4 completed April 7, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1ef6e6c81908a8ee52e4d28127b completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:36 a.m.