Triple
T10263277
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reynolds American Inc. |
E240651
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableBrandPortfolio |
P48668
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Camel and Newport |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Camel and Newport | Statement: [Reynolds American Inc., notableBrandPortfolio, Camel and Newport]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableBrandPortfolio Context triple: [Reynolds American Inc., notableBrandPortfolio, Camel and Newport]
-
A.
notableBrandElement
Indicates that one entity is a significant or distinguishing brand-related feature, component, or asset of another entity.
-
B.
notableManufacturer
Indicates that an entity is a well-known or prominent producer or maker of another entity.
-
C.
associatedBrandCollection
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one or more brands are grouped or linked together as part of a specific collection.
-
D.
parentBrand
Indicates that one brand is the overarching or owning brand from which another brand is derived or subordinated.
-
E.
hasBrandConcept
Indicates that an entity is associated with or embodies a particular brand concept or branding idea.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d2872830819080fdfa816167d04c |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1ef6e6c81908a8ee52e4d28127b |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:33 a.m.