Triple
T10259530
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Boz-Kourt |
E240558
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCourtCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
|
E851644
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case | Statement: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case Context triple: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
-
A.
Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice
The Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice was the foundational legal instrument establishing the structure, jurisdiction, and procedures of the League of Nations’ principal judicial body, the predecessor to today’s International Court of Justice.
-
B.
Statute of the International Court of Justice
The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
-
C.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
D.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
-
E.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case Triple: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
Generated description
The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case Target entity description: The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
-
A.
Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice
The Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice was the foundational legal instrument establishing the structure, jurisdiction, and procedures of the League of Nations’ principal judicial body, the predecessor to today’s International Court of Justice.
-
B.
Statute of the International Court of Justice
The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
-
C.
International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
-
D.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
-
E.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d24e94e08190ad2b9733bf621fe4 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d6f7e9a9d48190865f047750d7bc6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d6fcabb5a08190a26c068163f48878 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d6fd7212b88190b410b8e1cc6f56fd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:32 a.m.