Triple

T10259530
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Boz-Kourt E240558 entity
Predicate relatedCourtCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
E851644 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case | Statement: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
Context triple: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
  • A. Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice
    The Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice was the foundational legal instrument establishing the structure, jurisdiction, and procedures of the League of Nations’ principal judicial body, the predecessor to today’s International Court of Justice.
  • B. Statute of the International Court of Justice
    The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
  • C. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
    The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
  • D. International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
    The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
  • E. International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
    The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
Triple: [Boz-Kourt, relatedCourtCase, Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case]
Generated description
The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
Target entity description: The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
  • A. Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice
    The Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice was the foundational legal instrument establishing the structure, jurisdiction, and procedures of the League of Nations’ principal judicial body, the predecessor to today’s International Court of Justice.
  • B. Statute of the International Court of Justice
    The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
  • C. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
    The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
  • D. International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
    The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
  • E. International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
    The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d24e94e08190ad2b9733bf621fe4 completed April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d6f7e9a9d48190865f047750d7bc6c completed April 9, 2026, 12:50 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69d6fcabb5a08190a26c068163f48878 completed April 9, 2026, 1:11 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69d6fd7212b88190b410b8e1cc6f56fd completed April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:32 a.m.