Triple

T10258980
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pavier quartos E240544 entity
Predicate haveLegalContext P2132 FINISHED
Object Stationers’ Company regulations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stationers’ Company regulations | Statement: [Pavier quartos, haveLegalContext, Stationers’ Company regulations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: haveLegalContext
Context triple: [Pavier quartos, haveLegalContext, Stationers’ Company regulations]
  • A. legalContext chosen
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
  • B. hasLegalRelevanceIn
    Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
  • C. hasLegalSubject
    Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
  • D. hasCivilContext
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within a civil (non-criminal) legal or societal context.
  • E. hasJurisdictionContext
    Indicates that a particular legal or regulatory authority, scope, or domain applies to or governs the referenced relationship or action.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d2b5853081909cd0397e08a0f44d completed April 7, 2026, 9:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1edae6881909a65201b8e51ea0a completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:31 a.m.