Triple

T10249818
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kar E240310 entity
Predicate chosenAs P10044 FINISHED
Object successor to the mystical protector LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: successor to the mystical protector | Statement: [Kar, chosenAs, successor to the mystical protector]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chosenAs
Context triple: [Kar, chosenAs, successor to the mystical protector]
  • A. selectedAt
    Indicates that an entity was chosen or picked at a specific point in time or under particular selection conditions.
  • B. selectedTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity has been chosen or designated from a set of candidates to perform a role, receive something, or participate in an activity in relation to another entity.
  • C. madeChoiceBetween
    Indicates that an entity selected one option from among two or more specified alternatives.
  • D. selectionMadeBy
    Indicates that a particular choice or selection was performed or decided by a specific agent or entity.
  • E. holderSelection
    Indicates that a particular entity has been chosen or designated to serve as the holder of another entity or resource.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d328272c8190a3548d7f7f38cfc4 completed April 7, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1ebd6c88190a1f3f4a72a99d6fe completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:28 a.m.