Triple
T10235389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of the Czech Republic |
E243449
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesToBranchOfLaw |
P88268
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil law | Statement: [Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, appliesToBranchOfLaw, civil law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesToBranchOfLaw Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Czech Republic, appliesToBranchOfLaw, civil law]
-
A.
branchOfLaw
Indicates a relationship where one legal field or discipline is a subdivision or specialized area within a broader body of law.
-
B.
appliedLawFrom
Indicates that a specific law or legal provision was applied or derived from a particular source, context, or jurisdiction in a legal decision or situation.
-
C.
legalCodeAppliesTo
Indicates that a particular legal code or statute is applicable to, or governs, a specified subject, situation, or entity.
-
D.
involvedInLegalDoctrine
Indicates that an entity plays a role in the formation, interpretation, application, or development of a particular legal doctrine.
-
E.
legalSystemSpecialization
chosen
Indicates that a legal system is specialized or tailored to address a particular domain, issue, or type of case within the broader legal framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b0f97c819085c9b45799a5fb7c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d23b620c8190b8a72d0eb0d16b93 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1e9798c8190b437d53d48554ba1 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:22 a.m.