Triple
T10226073
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Silent Fall |
E243206
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresCharacterWithCondition |
P28619
|
FINISHED |
| Object | autism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: autism | Statement: [Silent Fall, featuresCharacterWithCondition, autism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresCharacterWithCondition Context triple: [Silent Fall, featuresCharacterWithCondition, autism]
-
A.
featuresCharactersFrom
Indicates that one entity (such as a work or production) includes or presents characters originating from another entity.
-
B.
featuresCharacterRole
Indicates that a work includes a character appearing in a specific narrative or functional role.
-
C.
hasSupportingCharacterTrait
chosen
Indicates that a supporting character possesses a particular trait, quality, or characteristic.
-
D.
featuresReturnOf
Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or product) includes or highlights the comeback or reappearance of a person, character, element, or feature.
-
E.
findingCharacterization
Indicates that a finding is being described or classified in terms of its nature, features, or diagnostic significance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b0f97c819085c9b45799a5fb7c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d23b620c8190b8a72d0eb0d16b93 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1e9798c8190b437d53d48554ba1 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:17 a.m.