Triple
T10223140
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Godavari Pushkar |
E242631
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityArrangements |
P92827
|
FINISHED |
| Object | large-scale crowd management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: large-scale crowd management | Statement: [Godavari Pushkar, securityArrangements, large-scale crowd management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityArrangements Context triple: [Godavari Pushkar, securityArrangements, large-scale crowd management]
-
A.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
-
B.
securityFeature
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
C.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
D.
securityLocation
Indicates the place or area where security-related activities, measures, or responsibilities are situated or applied.
-
E.
securityMechanism
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d3aa8305e481908ee1fc1d9eda6fa0 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d3955f61f88190b8d37ff645cd44d3 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d3aa208c248190a0fb186b106389f3 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:10 a.m.