Triple

T10221358
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Provincial Executive E242586 entity
Predicate mayConclude P92819 FINISHED
Object administrative agreements with municipalities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: administrative agreements with municipalities | Statement: [Provincial Executive, mayConclude, administrative agreements with municipalities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayConclude
Context triple: [Provincial Executive, mayConclude, administrative agreements with municipalities]
  • A. canConclude
    Indicates that one entity is able to logically derive or reach a conclusion about another entity or situation.
  • B. canBeConcludedWith
    Indicates that one situation, process, or sequence is able to be finished, resolved, or brought to an end by another specified action or condition.
  • C. mayConduct
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to carry out, perform, or execute a particular action, process, or operation on or with another entity.
  • D. mayResultIn
    Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
  • E. hasConclusion
    Indicates that something leads to, results in, or is associated with a particular conclusion.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d3aa740db88190ba707226e36de0ed completed April 6, 2026, 12:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d3955f61f88190b8d37ff645cd44d3 completed April 6, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d3aa208c248190a0fb186b106389f3 completed April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:09 a.m.