Triple
T10216657
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1657 |
E242461
|
entity |
| Predicate | updates |
P4061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 1519 |
E198873
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1519 | Statement: [RFC 1657, updates, RFC 1519]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1519 Context triple: [RFC 1657, updates, RFC 1519]
-
A.
RFC 1519
chosen
RFC 1519 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that originally specified Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) for more efficient IP address allocation and routing on the Internet.
-
B.
RFC 1592
RFC 1592 is an early Internet standards document that specified procedures and mechanisms related to network management and operations before being superseded by later RFCs.
-
C.
RFC 1591
RFC 1591 is an Internet standards document that defines the structure, administration, and delegation policies for top-level domains in the Domain Name System (DNS).
-
D.
RFC 1195
RFC 1195 is the IETF standard that extends the IS-IS routing protocol to support multiple network layer protocols, including IP.
-
E.
RFC 1939
RFC 1939 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Post Office Protocol version 3 (POP3) used for retrieving email from a mail server.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d3aa6e544c8190961cdd7f1fbe24e6 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d6a804e8748190b4ebcfa9a0bb889f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:06 a.m.