Triple

T10214223
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Core Animation E242401 entity
Predicate supportsLayerHierarchy P92765 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Core Animation, supportsLayerHierarchy, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsLayerHierarchy
Context triple: [Core Animation, supportsLayerHierarchy, true]
  • A. hasHierarchyIn
    Indicates that one entity occupies a higher or lower level within an ordered structure or chain of command relative to another entity in a specified context.
  • B. supportsLayer2
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility or functionality for operating with a second-layer (Layer 2) protocol or solution built on top of another underlying system.
  • C. supportsLayeredDivisionMultiplexing
    Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with the use of layered division multiplexing techniques in conjunction with another entity.
  • D. supportsHierarchicalRouting
    Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with routing that uses a multi-level or hierarchical structure of routing domains or paths.
  • E. layerOf
    Indicates that one entity forms a distinct layer or stratum of another entity within a structured or composite whole.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d3aa273bdc8190bc4cf67a7923cebc completed April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d39559e5ac8190b88eca75956b7e6a completed April 6, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d3aa208c248190a0fb186b106389f3 completed April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:04 a.m.