Triple
T10205187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Convention de Washington |
E242173
|
entity |
| Predicate | catégorieDeDroit |
P76736
|
FINISHED |
| Object | droit international de l’environnement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: droit international de l’environnement | Statement: [Convention de Washington, catégorieDeDroit, droit international de l’environnement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: catégorieDeDroit Context triple: [Convention de Washington, catégorieDeDroit, droit international de l’environnement]
-
A.
juridicalCategory
chosen
Indicates the legal classification or status under which an entity or relationship is formally recognized in a juridical system.
-
B.
branchOfLaw
Indicates a relationship where one legal field or discipline is a subdivision or specialized area within a broader body of law.
-
C.
typeOfLaw
Indicates that one entity is a specific category or kind of law to which the other entity pertains.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
doctrineClassification
Indicates how a particular doctrine is categorized or classified within a defined system of doctrinal types.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381ae26c48190985abd0e25ee5d04 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d3aa22071c819095febd18dd607978 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d39559e5ac8190b88eca75956b7e6a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 10:42 a.m.