Triple

T10194353
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Drew Baylor E238119 entity
Predicate findsPurposeThrough P92630 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Drew Baylor, findsPurposeThrough, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: findsPurposeThrough
Context triple: [Drew Baylor, findsPurposeThrough, romantic relationship]
  • A. purpose
    Indicates that one entity exists, is done, or is used in order to achieve, support, or serve the goal, function, or intended outcome of another entity.
  • B. meetsForPurpose
    Indicates that one entity meets with another specifically to pursue or accomplish a particular purpose or objective.
  • C. explorationPurpose
    Indicates that an entity is engaged in or associated with an activity whose primary goal is exploration or discovery.
  • D. cultPurpose
    Indicates that an entity (such as a cult, group, or organization) exists or operates with a specific overarching purpose, goal, or objective.
  • E. soughtTo
    Indicates that one entity attempted or intended to obtain, achieve, or bring about another entity or outcome.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84de1b208190bf17bb305b002605 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdedc7cc748190bceb8f657afcc054 completed April 2, 2026, 4:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd7c8477648190bc55c56aeec507d3 completed April 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd7edc6cf081909d95859d880a4059 completed April 1, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:13 p.m.