Triple

T10182067
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tolna County E236810 entity
Predicate locatedInFormerKingdomRegion P29444 FINISHED
Object historic Tolna comitatus LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historic Tolna comitatus | Statement: [Tolna County, locatedInFormerKingdomRegion, historic Tolna comitatus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: locatedInFormerKingdomRegion
Context triple: [Tolna County, locatedInFormerKingdomRegion, historic Tolna comitatus]
  • A. locatedInModernAdministrativeRegion
    Indicates that an entity is geographically situated within the boundaries of a current, officially recognized administrative region.
  • B. historicalRegionNowInCountry
    Indicates that a historical region is currently located within the borders or jurisdiction of a specified modern country.
  • C. kingdomAssociatedWith
    Indicates a relationship where something is connected or related to a particular kingdom, such as belonging to, originating from, or being governed by that kingdom.
  • D. locatedInFormerAdministrativeTerritory chosen
    Indicates that an entity is situated within the boundaries of an administrative territory that no longer exists or has been reorganized.
  • E. historicallyPartOf
    Indicates that one entity was formerly a component, region, or subdivision of another entity during a past historical period, but is not necessarily part of it in the present.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84d7260c8190bfbec36762943f37 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cded32b91c8190b01ad37b2456080a completed April 2, 2026, 4:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd7c79f21c8190a7f31b2eab80b8ba completed April 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:12 p.m.